From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 21 23:07:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739B1106566C for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:07:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56948FC08 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3LN7D3f006463; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:07:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q3LN7DVu006460; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:07:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:07:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Thomas Schmitt In-Reply-To: <99329673623314@192.168.2.69> Message-ID: References: <99329673623314@192.168.2.69> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:07:13 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what's wrong with cd9660 fs X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:07:16 -0000 > I am currently trying to understand how fs/udf handles multiple extents. > /usr/src/sys/fs/udf/udf_vnops.c > bears in function udf_bmap_internal() a comment: > * If the offset is beyond the current extent, look for the > * next extent. > > > Have a nice day :) > > Thomas > > for now i add -udf when using mkisofs and mount_udf reads fine. anyway i would be happy to see fully working ISO filesystem, which is nearly optimal for read only usage. thank you very much