Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:07:13 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup@gmx.net>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: what's wrong with cd9660 fs
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204220105510.6348@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <99329673623314@192.168.2.69>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204201700100.96314@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <99329673623314@192.168.2.69>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I am currently trying to understand how fs/udf handles multiple extents.
>  /usr/src/sys/fs/udf/udf_vnops.c
> bears in function udf_bmap_internal() a comment:
>                 * If the offset is beyond the current extent, look for the
>                 * next extent.
>
>
> Have a nice day :)
>
> Thomas
>
>
for now i add -udf when using mkisofs and mount_udf reads fine. anyway i 
would be happy to see fully working ISO filesystem, which is nearly 
optimal for read only usage.

thank you very much



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1204220105510.6348>