From owner-freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 08:48:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-infiniband@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBFD9B352B for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 08:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 258E71D8C for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 08:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CF871FE023; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:48:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <55C5C2A8.4070908@selasky.org> Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 10:49:44 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-infiniband@FreeBSD.org, Oded Shanoon Subject: Re: unify_tcp_port_space in OFED References: <20150807214626.GA3146@nparhar-pc> In-Reply-To: <20150807214626.GA3146@nparhar-pc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Infiniband on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 08:48:19 -0000 On 08/07/15 23:46, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > Hello Hans, > > Looks like the last major OFED update (r278886) is missing unify_tcp_port_space > and associated code in cma.c. See the same file in stable/10 or any revision > prior to r278886. iWARP on FreeBSD has always used the kernel's TCP port space > because that's the correct thing to do. I can fix this in head but if this > piece of code is gone from upstream then we'll have to be extra careful during > future OFED refreshes as we do want to keep this functionality in FreeBSD. > > Regards, > Navdeep > Hi Oded, Can you comment on the above? --HPS