From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 29 19:06:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F701065679 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:06:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francisco.cabrita@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f171.google.com (mail-yx0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18EB8FC0A for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe1 with SMTP id 1so6474984yxe.3 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:06:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=aWBCkyCg1ZyYLGgg39dAictujXgf5MhS6bUAWAE5j8U=; b=rWtabIQiZHpiTw6vm9JsncmVSQQLX1r/hM2sDKqMeQ8BpunlgNgtlGIhnljT9fvEgs KEu9Qb9EzIiDxVLwGrQyyY9gXua3cdl9/gNDu5mqvPcUsgZjnH3PgFg+cqfFUVSQvcQi 8iWBwLpLWEk4lnv84GfJ/q3E4gh2PqBE0X7oo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=MgWnFXFwSgnzwXhVx6VIxZO4T4De6zI+07lI1wLe5OkALHs/UhX2qw6TrIg/BDgn66 PygSA1XTmNG9o9CG53tzmhhSmEEIfvulaGyh6AMVttygKPFZUR19NTLInKL8vdyz+Zod DOif3eTNgqI9OH++nP/5t6N8P0aiCOQONxVh4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.50.30 with SMTP id x30mr5003933anx.169.1254251169100; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:06:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <458792029.144491254249841202.JavaMail.root@shee.earlham.edu> References: <689d500ec8c95542a53440b8a23ae773@mail.liquidphlux.com> <458792029.144491254249841202.JavaMail.root@shee.earlham.edu> From: Francisco Cabrita Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:05:49 +0100 Message-ID: To: Randy Schultz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:06:10 -0000 On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Randy Schultz wrote: > > ----- "Andrew Kuriger" spaketh thusly: > > | > | Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I > | think > | this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to > | read the > | documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which > | is > | available in ports, I believe it is safe to chuck this lame > | benchmark. > > > Hrm. IMHO, this benchmark actually tells us something interesting. It > tells us > that with the anchor thrown overboard, freebsd is nearly as fast as linux. > > mega lol :) > -- > > Randy (schulra@earlham.edu) 765.983.1283 <*> > > The penguin cometh > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- blog: http://sufixo.com/raw http://www.linkedin.com/in/franciscocabrita