From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 20 15:42:24 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA10489 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 20 Jan 1997 15:42:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from fyeung5.netific.com (netific.vip.best.com [205.149.182.145]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id PAA10484 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 1997 15:42:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from fyeung8.netific.com (fyeung8.netific.com [204.238.125.8]) by fyeung5.netific.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA10230; Mon, 20 Jan 1997 15:46:24 -0800 Received: by fyeung8.netific.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA07519; Mon, 20 Jan 1997 15:49:32 -0800 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 15:49:32 -0800 From: fyeung@fyeung8.netific.com (Francis Yeung) Message-Id: <9701202349.AA07519@fyeung8.netific.com> To: hackers@freebsd.org, hal@vailsys.com Subject: Re: IBM Token ring driver X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hal, How you talk to Madge by any chance ? If Olicom uses TI or NS chipsets, there are plenty of information around. There is a IBM Token Ring packet driver with source. Will this help. You need some LLC code which can be cut and pasted from the other sources. Francis > From root@fyeung25.netific.com Mon Jan 20 15:27 PST 1997 > Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 15:41:40 -0600 > From: Hal Snyder > Mime-Version: 1.0 > To: hackers@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: IBM Token ring driver > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Stefan Molnar wrote: > > > have you tried olicom? I heard that they are more forgiving > > with opening up eith driver info. I would like to do it, but > > I am not a programer, I am a silly person. > > I talked to Olicom a year ago about writing a FreeBSD token driver for > their PCI token ring card, since my employer at the time was stuck with > a lot of legacy dinosaur equipment. > > The response I got was that driver writers' documentation was trade > secret and they had absolutely no intention of telling anyone how their > superlative token ring card works. > > After that, all nodes added to the LAN were ether. We had that luxury, > since cabling was CAT-5 and the main router had both types of > interface. :) > > Hal > >