From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Aug 12 22:23:41 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA11169
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 22:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA11164
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 22:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from brett@lariat.org)
Received: (from brett@localhost)
	by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id XAA07849;
	Wed, 12 Aug 1998 23:23:08 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199808130523.XAA07849@lariat.lariat.org>
X-Sender: brett@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1.0.44 (Beta)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 23:23:07 -0600
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Subject: 64-bit time_t
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

How soon will FreeBSD move to a 64-bit time_t? The article at

http://www.wired.com/news/news/technology/story/14390.html

paints a dire picture; it'd be nice to say that FreeBSD solves the problem
already.

--Brett

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message