From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Apr 29 16:33:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CB82BB142 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@gregv.net) Received: from aurora.gregv.net (aurora.gregv.net [192.111.144.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C3x3650Pz4VV0; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@gregv.net) Received: by aurora.gregv.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5AFA4763; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:33:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:33:42 -0400 From: Greg Veldman To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: Maintainer of FreeBSD Mailman , Chris , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: mail/mailman v3? Message-ID: <20200429163342.GU1068@aurora.gregv.net> References: <20200429024336.GT1068@aurora.gregv.net> <202004291500.03TF01F4049616@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202004291500.03TF01F4049616@fire.js.berklix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49C3x3650Pz4VV0 X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@gregv.net has no SPF policy when checking 192.111.144.138) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@gregv.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.01 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gregv.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.990,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:31863, ipnet:192.111.144.0/20, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(1.12)[ipnet: 192.111.144.0/20(2.02), asn: 31863(3.62), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:33:45 -0000 On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Even if it's possible to bend ports/mail/mailman to support Mailman3 > Please do not do it; keep it clean for just Mailman2 > (Else it would cause big run time problems for user admins (inc. me)). > > Any who will want Mailman3 should please clone ports/mail/mailman to > ports/mail/mailman3 (not ports/mail/mailman2) & work there. Thanks There is not yet a port for Mailman3, but the one that is in progress looks like it will go into mail/mailman3 when complete. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225543 This should not cause any conflicts for Mailman2 users. -- Greg Veldman freebsd@gregv.net