Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:37:29 -0700 From: Studded <Studded@dal.net> To: Drew Baxter <netmonger@genesis.ispace.com> Cc: rotel@indigo.ie, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Packet/traffic shapper ? Message-ID: <3608A539.B9BD103E@dal.net> References: <199809211827.OAA09675@Loki.orland.u91.k12.me.us> <netmonger@genesis.ispace.com> <199809230009.UAA11487@Loki.orland.u91.k12.me.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Drew Baxter wrote: > > At 12:49 AM 9/23/98 +0000, Niall Smart wrote: > > > >Personally I don't think IPFW_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT is a bad idea, once you > >are sure you have the accept rules necessary to ensure your connectivity > >to the host you can pop in a deny all rule. This will probably be slower > >than defaulting to deny though. > --- > Hm, isn't default_to_accept still affected by ipfw flush? No it's not, that's one of the reasons the option was added. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3608A539.B9BD103E>