From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 17:00:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA42106564A for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E60E8FC1B for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p34H0TT3052116 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:00:29 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p34H0Ts5052113; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:00:29 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:00:29 GMT Message-Id: <201104041700.p34H0Ts5052113@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Charlie Kester Cc: Subject: Re: ports/156173: [patch] security/nettle update to 2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Charlie Kester List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:00:29 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/156173; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Charlie Kester To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Hirohisa Yamaguchi , Frederic Culot , johans@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/156173: [patch] security/nettle update to 2.1 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 09:55:52 -0700 Cf. PR 149361 When this came up before, it looked like nettle 2.1 is incompatible with the current versions of rdup and pike78. Since there were no other ports that depended on nettle, we have been waiting for the upstream authors to update their software to use the newer version. But now, since there is apparently a third port depending on nettle -- and one that will probably be used more often! -- we'll have to take another look at rdup and pike78, to see if they can use nettle 2.1. It might be necessary to create seperate ports for nettle20 and nettle21.