From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 7 9:13: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from lists01.iafrica.com (lists01.iafrica.com [196.7.0.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234FF37B422 for ; Mon, 7 May 2001 09:13:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@uunet.co.za) Received: from nwl.fw.uunet.co.za ([196.31.2.162]) by lists01.iafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #2) id 14wnd4-0005jw-00 for hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 May 2001 18:12:58 +0200 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by nwl.fw.uunet.co.za (8.8.8/8.6.9) id SAA21904 for ; Mon, 7 May 2001 18:12:57 +0200 (SAST) Received: by nwl.fw.uunet.co.za via recvmail id 21876; Mon May 7 18:12:29 2001 Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.fw.uunet.co.za) by axl.fw.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14wnca-000PZQ-00 for hackers@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 07 May 2001 18:12:28 +0200 To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 18:12:28 +0200 Message-ID: <98295.989251948@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> From: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi folks, Is there a good reason why sysctl(8) won't display _any_ output for opaque MIB entries named as arguments? I'm specifically interested in kern.proc.all. I can ``sysctl -A | grep kern.proc.all'', but it's weird that neither of these two do anything useful: sysctl -A kern.proc.all sysctl kern.proc.all Is there some sound reason for this, or am I just lost on the fringes of what sysctl(8) was designed for? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message