Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 11:45:39 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: Nathan Ferris <nferris@spider.innercite.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD v Linux Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970121114352.24610J-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <199701210400.UAA11087@spider.innercite.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 20 Jan 1997, Nathan Ferris wrote: > I'm running windows95 on a 486 machine. I would like to partition my hard > drive and run Win95 and Linux (Debian) or FreeBSD simultaneously. I think > that I have the partitioning thing about down, but I can't decide whether I > should go in for Linux or FreeBSD. Are there any major differences? From > the info given out in both web sites it seems as though they are pretty > much the same. Any help you could give would be greatly appreciated. Thanks They are quite different in philosophy and design. I would suggest checking out the mail archives at http://www.freebsd.org. Many such discussions have gone on; perhaps one of those can give you some insight. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.94.970121114352.24610J-100000>