From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 11:33:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F09ABC for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:33:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7B92BD6 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r97BXY1N014568; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:33:34 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r97BXYMP014567; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:33:34 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:33:34 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Pete French Subject: Re: pfsync between 8.4 and 9.2 Message-ID: <20131007113334.GR8860@FreeBSD.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, kron24@gmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 11:33:37 -0000 On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:33:09PM +0100, Pete French wrote: P> Just to follow this up for anyuone finding the thread, after upgrading P> the other firewall to 9.2 as well, pfsync works fine agai. The failover P> actually seems a lot faster in fact, so it looks like a big improvements. Btw, pfsync between 9.x and 10.x is compatible, so provided you have a failover, you are encouraged to try 10-ALPHA4, where pf(4) has got performance improvements comparing to 9.x. More on pf(4) in 10.x: http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2012-10-2012-12.html#SMP-Friendly-pf%284%29 Where to get latest 10.0-ALPHA4 release: http://www.freebsd.org/where.html#helptest -- Totus tuus, Glebius.