Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:19:57 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Niki Denev <nike_d@cytexbg.com>, "Gelsema, P \(Patrick\)" <gelsemap@superhero.nl> Subject: Re: Adaptec AHD U320 operating as only U160 (take care with this hack!) Message-ID: <200802181419.57455.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <2e77fc10802180748p5e78ef98s5fbbc27b8e7df3aa@mail.gmail.com> References: <200704182239.59842.gelsemap@superhero.nl> <200802181228.18458.joao@matik.com.br> <2e77fc10802180748p5e78ef98s5fbbc27b8e7df3aa@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 18 February 2008 12:48:43 Niki Denev wrote: > On Feb 18, 2008 3:28 PM, JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> wrote: > > On Monday 18 February 2008 11:57:26 Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrot= e: > > > On Mon, February 18, 2008 15:49, JoaoBR wrote: > > > > On Monday 18 February 2008 11:07:03 Scott Long wrote: > > > >> You are confusing people by posting a response to a discussion that > > > >> has already moved beyond where you are responding. The real fix to > > > >> the original poster's problem has already been identified, please > > > >> catch up. > > > > > > > > not so sure about this ... > > > > > > > > firstable I guess I was the original poster some month ago ... > > > > > > > > secondable I let it clear that it seems to work for Adaptec's 29320 > > > > but not on > > > > other adaptors which I let also clear in my former msg, just read it > > > > entirely > > > > > > Joao, > > > > > > is this because of your hack or because of the cvs commit: > > > src/sys/dev/aic7xxx aic79xx_osm.c version 1.32? > > > > > > That is why I am confused. > > > > > > If you get it because of the committed version, could you please let = me > > > know how how I can repeat this on my machine, as I would love to see > > > this version committed to RELENG_7_0. > > > > no, also not my hack, I believe it was Niki or Justin who suggested to > > comment a part in cam_xpto.c > > > > only with this hack the problem occures > > > > BTW without it the drives are still only at 160/80 negotiated > > There is some misunderstanding here. > I had the negotiation problem, and as a result of this i started playing > around with DTrace on this machine and discovered that if I comment these > lines my drives were correctly detected. I posted this as a pointer/clue = to > the problem. Then Justin replied, that the actual problem is in the aic79= xx > driver not properly > exporting it's capabilites to CAM, and the latest revisions of > aic_79xx_osm.c > 1.30 > fix this. There is no need to touch cam_xpt.c, just update > aic_79xx_osm.c, and the problem > should be resolved. > well, or my english sounds greek but I never said something different, I s= aid=20 that the cam_xpto.c hack give up problems,=20 I never said that the new aic79xx_osm.c is a problem neither mentioned the= =20 file =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200802181419.57455.joao>