From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 03:35:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136C816A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 03:35:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EF143F3F for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 03:35:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com) Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 4.22) id 1AQmKd-0005Fe-LC; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:35:11 +0000 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, kolicz@eunet.yu In-Reply-To: <20031201055940.GA520@> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:35:11 +0000 Subject: Re: mail without mta X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:35:18 -0000 > I'd like to know if some- > one has experience with system > running no mta (aka sendmail). Running without an MTA sounds like the wrong solution to the problem. Have you thought of replacing sendmail with something like exim ? I use that as an MTA on single machines all the time. very easy to configure and not very resource hungry. Willjust sit there quietly and do the job without any fuss. ...there are a number of other options too which people will no doubt mention. -pcf.