From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 06:26:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812061065670; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:26:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bpurgar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519C28FC19; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so17517915pzk.18 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:26:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cs0LsXDveT3BimYsPOLyJNNloTn1md0OPViU/XKWSqo=; b=Njo7k1J0JsHWq2JfCSrfAQeRkl7aMoAgPTvQ6FpYEyCbj+HUwW+CNd5c4gN2BYFY3/ 9nobHXKjEl6WXzh/z3A6mEOKQg1SSrrUaZe5uOOEE9FTSpGrd+f+q431LmxhBtlL/BVn ToiBw8pnOZIZDh1R/Can9ZJBNEN1YWMZssom0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.36.227 with SMTP id t3mr2690330pbj.273.1315722391819; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.246.15 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:26:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:26:31 +0200 Message-ID: From: Berislav Purgar To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] if_ath_tx: change interrupt scheduling deferral X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:26:32 -0000 On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 11 September 2011 00:48, Berislav Purgar wrote: > > > i tested new patches and can tell that works ok. i don't see any error > > messages in logfile for both cards (high trafic load). regarding to > > anything i tested (HT20/40) iperf shows > > Sweet. > > > TCP ~ 9.8MB/s UPD ~ 13MB/s on HT/20 . > > TCP ~ 13MB/s UDP ~ 19.7MB/s on HT/40 > > > > this results are when AR5416 act as iperf server and AR9280 as client, in > > another case results are worse. > > AR5416 works in sta and AR9280 in hostap mode. > > that's all for now :) > > Yeah; things get a bit unpredictable at times. I'll do some further > digging to try and understand why. > I still think it's a dodgy mix of issues with periodic calibration and > rate control. > > I'm still working out the kinks with my current patch. I'll post > another one shortly for you (and others!) to try. > > Finally, have you seen any device timeouts? Or odd traffic hangs? > > Thanks, > > > Adrian > as i mention before . no errors at any tipe .. Beri