Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 19:59:14 -0700 From: David Johnson <david@usermode.org> To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LibH or Anaconda ?? Message-ID: <200405251959.14689.david@usermode.org> In-Reply-To: <20040526015840.14562.qmail@web90101.mail.scd.yahoo.com> References: <20040526015840.14562.qmail@web90101.mail.scd.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 06:58 pm, Gao Long wrote: > The only thing I thought about anaconda for a native FreeBSD > install is that , shall we package an entire FreeBSD into RPM > packages?:)While the rpm need a recompile if we are not to use > linux.ko.Or we will have to invent a different one? Since Anaconda is Open Source, that means we can change it to fit our needs. Not just the partitioning portion of it, but also the package management portion. In other words, we don't have to use RPM just because Anaconda does. p.s. I'm not sold on Anaconda, but neither am I sold against it. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405251959.14689.david>