From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sat Oct 20 14:57:18 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D14FE873E; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunpoet@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 887A074799; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunpoet@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repo.freebsd.org (repo.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6068::e6a:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 837AB1F849; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunpoet@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repo.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.37]) by repo.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9KEvHSM023904; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:57:17 GMT (envelope-from sunpoet@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from sunpoet@localhost) by repo.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9KEvHGd023903; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:57:17 GMT (envelope-from sunpoet@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201810201457.w9KEvHGd023903@repo.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repo.freebsd.org: sunpoet set sender to sunpoet@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:57:17 +0000 (UTC) To: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r482553 - head/security/vuxml X-SVN-Group: ports-head X-SVN-Commit-Author: sunpoet X-SVN-Commit-Paths: head/security/vuxml X-SVN-Commit-Revision: 482553 X-SVN-Commit-Repository: ports MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:57:18 -0000 Author: sunpoet Date: Sat Oct 20 14:57:16 2018 New Revision: 482553 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/482553 Log: Document ruby vulnerability PR: 232427 (based on) Submitted by: Yasuhiro KIMURA Modified: head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml Modified: head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml ============================================================================== --- head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml Sat Oct 20 14:56:29 2018 (r482552) +++ head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml Sat Oct 20 14:57:16 2018 (r482553) @@ -58,6 +58,57 @@ Notes: * Do not forget port variants (linux-f10-libxml2, libxml2, etc.) --> + + ruby -- multiple vulnerabilities + + + ruby + 2.3.0,12.3.8,1 + 2.4.0,12.4.5,1 + 2.5.0,12.5.2,1 + + + + +

Ruby news:

+
CVE-2018-16395: OpenSSL::X509::Name equality check does not work + correctly
+
An instance of OpenSSL::X509::Name contains entities such as CN, C and + so on. Some two instances of OpenSSL::X509::Name are equal only when + all entities are exactly equal. However, there is a bug that the + equality check is not correct if the value of an entity of the + argument (right-hand side) starts with the value of the receiver + (left-hand side). So, if a malicious X.509 certificate is passed to + compare with an existing certificate, there is a possibility to be + judged incorrectly that they are equal.
+
CVE-2018-16396: Tainted flags are not propagated in Array#pack and + String#unpack with some directives
+
Array#pack method converts the receiver's contents into a string with + specified format. If the receiver contains some tainted objects, the + returned string also should be tainted. String#unpack method which + converts the receiver into an array also should propagate its tainted + flag to the objects contained in the returned array. But, with B, b, H + and h directives, the tainted flags are not propagated. So, if a script + processes unreliable inputs by Array#pack and/or String#unpack with + these directives and checks the reliability with tainted flags, the + check might be wrong.
+

+ + + + https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/ruby-2-5-2-released/ + https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/openssl-x509-name-equality-check-does-not-work-correctly-cve-2018-16395/ + https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/not-propagated-taint-flag-in-some-formats-of-pack-cve-2018-16396/ + CVE-2018-16395 + CVE-2018-16396 + + + 2018-10-17 + 2018-10-20 + + + MySQL -- multiple vulnerabilities