From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Dec 23 14:55:48 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9407DEA77BA; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 14:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78C5565E2F; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 14:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1BE3E42; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 08:55:46 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 08:55:45 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Jan Beich Cc: Mark Linimon , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r456719 - in head: biology/bedtools comms/gnuradio editors/libreoffice emulators/stella games/armagetron graphics/gsculpt net/linknx net/rsplib science/afni security/botan2 security/hig... Message-ID: <20171223145545.GA13962@lonesome.com> References: <201712191441.vBJEfTLf054114@repo.freebsd.org> <8tdy-a671-wny@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8tdy-a671-wny@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 14:55:48 -0000 I've put the individual ports on my to-do list, but some general comments: On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 08:06:10PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: > Marking each port individually where commit message contains an excerpt > more than 1 line long would be more helpful. I'm sorry, but I don't have the cycles to spend 30min/port when I'm going through hundreds of failures in an attempt to bring an arch up to parity. > Why limit to Tier2 when Tier1 architectures are also affected? Affects > any FreeBSD release/architecture defaulting to libc++ 4.0 or later. As I've said before, this was my mistake in not double-checking to ensure the development portsmon instance was working right; I wasn't seeing the 11.x errors. I've fixed the bug there. > Probably was due to a bug in emulators/qemu-user-static. I'm trying to hold the machine I am running regression tests on to one version of installed ports and one version of source. There are too many moving parts otherwise. It's taken several months as it is. I believe we will need several more -trybroken runs in the future to catch all the stragglers. This is especially frustrating right now because I'm having to wait for llvm40, webkit2-gtk3, and ffmpeg each to run (serially) to analyze the complete results of the armv6 -trybroken I am currently running. I would like to get all the commits that will result from that in before the new year, but now I am beginning to doubt it. After the new year I intend to issue a more general call for help on the arm ports. Right now there is still no way to see the forest for the trees. All IMHO. mcl