Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 15:03:26 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 61e4a788ecab - main - ports-mgmt/dialog4ports: mark as deprecated and broken on current Message-ID: <j2u37n3isjyvhukpnnfoyevuxmtn3olyiv25err337mmu22hxv@n2ld62hkna34> In-Reply-To: <20231221121956.GE45112@yz.kiev.ua> References: <202312201702.3BKH2hoN000120@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <ZYQi-s9TouldqO5r@FreeBSD.org> <C849BEA2-2258-44E1-8D55-558D75D9BE39@FreeBSD.org> <20231221121956.GE45112@yz.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:19:56PM +0200, George L. Yermulnik wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 12:43:52 (+0100), Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > >> ports-mgmt/dialog4ports: mark as deprecated and broken on current
> > >> ---
> > >> +.if !exists(/usr/lib/libdialog.so)
> > >> +BROKEN= Requires libdialog in base
> > >> +.endif
> > >> +
> > >> +DEPRECATED= Consider using ports-mgmt/portconfig which is a dropin replacement
>
> > >Are there any plans to make it look like `ports-mgmt/dialog4ports'? Because
> > >right now it looks like shit so I had to add
>
> > > DIALOG4PORTS=${LOCALBASE}/bin/dialog4ports
>
> > >in my /etc/make.conf.
>
> > >./danfe
>
> > Sorry looks like shit means nothing to me so as long as we have nothing actionnable, no there will be no actions.
>
> > Please stop shitty feedbacks (yes I can be as constructive as you are)
>
> While not supporting Alexey's straight wording, I (as an ordinary
> FreeBSD user) would like to support his feeling: I tired `portconfig` a
> while ago and ended up with the same `DIALOG4PORTS=${LOCALBASE}/bin/dialog4ports`
> in /etc/make.conf as `dialog4ports` looks much neater and convenient.
>
> ps: apologies for the noise in the committers lists
>
don't apologies, this is what this mailing is for, what this mailing list is not
for, is people speaking the way Alexey just did.
First clearly none of those looks shitty to me!
Anyway according to you which one do you fine neater and more convenient ?
- https://bapt.nours.eu/1.png
- https://bapt.nours.eu/2.png
Best regards,
Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?j2u37n3isjyvhukpnnfoyevuxmtn3olyiv25err337mmu22hxv>