From owner-freebsd-java Thu Feb 28 7: 4:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net (smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net [203.16.214.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEEA37B41E for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:04:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from vee.net (wintermute.home.vee.net [203.18.245.2]) by smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1SF5Ga22976; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:35:16 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from mike@vee.net) Message-ID: <3C7E468B.6060005@vee.net> Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 01:32:35 +1030 From: Mike Gratton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8+) Gecko/20020221 X-Accept-Language: en-au, en-gb MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Koster, K.J." Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ugrade from linux-jdk to native References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FDA3C7@l04.research.kpn.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Koster, K.J. wrote: > > Would you introduce a JIT, saying it is slower than its predecessors? :-) > No, I guess not. 8) I concede your point, but hey, as you yourself said, Hotspot is pretty super-duper. I just wish I could remember where I read that about Hotspot's performance Vs native C++ - could have been from Sun, the original academic papers that were the basis for Hotspot, or [wince] sometime on Slashdot. I don't suppose anyone else here remembers hearing this as well, do they? -- Mike Gratton , "Every motive escalate." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message