From owner-cvs-ports  Fri Jul 14 17:18:24 1995
Return-Path: cvs-ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA06772
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:18:24 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA06759
          ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:18:13 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA15875; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:17:45 -0700
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:17:45 -0700
Message-Id: <199507150017.RAA15875@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: ache@astral.msk.su
CC: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@freefall.cdrom.com
In-reply-to: <SUarz0mOy3@astral.msk.su> (ache@astral.msk.su)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/pgpsendmail Makefile
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: cvs-ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * >Andrey, since pgp is NO_PACKAGE and IS_INTERACTIVE, does it make sense 
 * >for us to package this thing?  If not, please add a NO_PACKAGE to this 
 * >Makefile too.
 * 
 * This thing being packaged not contain any PGP materials, so I didn't
 * see a reason for NO_PACKAGE.
 * It makes sense for several ports which depends on PGP to build
 * PGP once on thud f.e. and not package PGP itself, but only
 * ports dependend.

Ah, I see.  However, the problem is that the package will contain the
name of the package depended, so there isn't really a way to build a
pgpsendmail package that can use either of the pgp versions....

Satoshi