From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Feb 24 23:35:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0EE247C4A for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:35:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from btv1==32373df4061==tom@invisible-island.net) Received: from smtp-nf-201.his.com (smtp-nf-201.his.com [216.194.196.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48RJMV2q5tz4NYw for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from btv1==32373df4061==tom@invisible-island.net) Received: from cuda201.his.com (cuda201.his.com [216.194.196.22]) by smtp-nf-201.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DABDC604AC for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:35:17 -0500 (EST) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1582587317-061c414c2e65c3c0001-XDYc8F Received: from smtp-nf-202.his.com (smtp-nf-202.his.com [216.194.196.20]) by cuda201.his.com with ESMTP id Bl1DHXbE4lCFXHKb; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:35:17 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: tom@invisible-island.net X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 216.194.196.20 Received: from zproxy101.his.com (zproxy101.his.com [18.218.2.49]) by smtp-nf-202.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C03D6019F; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:35:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zproxy101.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2305E17DB42; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:35:17 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: 18.218.2.49 X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: zproxy101.his.com[18.218.2.49] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 18.218.2.49 Received: from zproxy101.his.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zproxy101.his.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 0mcrIxqOZGro; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:35:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zproxy101.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5AB17DB4A; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:35:17 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zproxy101.his.com Received: from zproxy101.his.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zproxy101.his.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id GRprXC5BkPBZ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:35:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from prl-debianold-64.jexium-island.net (static-71-246-219-82.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.246.219.82]) by zproxy101.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E846117DB42; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:35:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from tom by prl-debianold-64.jexium-island.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j6NFs-0001GE-Nv; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:35:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:35:16 -0500 From: Thomas Dickey To: Yasuhiro KIMURA Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r358062(ncurses) breaks installed ports, howto check? Message-ID: <20200224233516.z6ateiibdm4hk36s@prl-debianold-64.jexium-island.net> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: r358062(ncurses) breaks installed ports, howto check? Reply-To: dickey@his.com References: <20200224202021.65ca7f64@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <20200225.043711.677660873587364878.yasu@utahime.org> <20200224232530.2ehw6l4blvqkgbd4@prl-debianold-64.jexium-island.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qwiiacggvlzqswl2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200224232530.2ehw6l4blvqkgbd4@prl-debianold-64.jexium-island.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp-nf-202.his.com[216.194.196.20] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1582587317 X-Barracuda-URL: https://spam.his.com:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at his.com X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 1945 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.80234 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48RJMV2q5tz4NYw X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of btv1==32373df4061==tom@invisible-island.net designates 216.194.196.93 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=btv1==32373df4061==tom@invisible-island.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.87 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[dickey@his.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:216.194.196.0/22]; IP_SCORE(-3.78)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 216.194.196.0/24(-4.95), asn: 11604(-3.96), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[his.com]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[dickey@his.com,btv1==32373df4061==tom@invisible-island.net]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[93.196.194.216.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11604, ipnet:216.194.196.0/24, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[dickey@his.com,btv1==32373df4061==tom@invisible-island.net]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:35:20 -0000 --qwiiacggvlzqswl2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 06:25:30PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 04:37:11AM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > > From: "O. Hartmann" > > Subject: r358062(ncurses) breaks installed ports, howto check? > > Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 20:19:59 +0100 > >=20 > > > After r358062, many installed ports do not work anymore on several ru= nning systems (CURRENT). > > > /usr/src/UPDATING states one should reinstall all ncurses depending p= orts, but no hint is > > > given! Can someone mitigate this lack of information? Is there a simp= le way to check what > > > ports installed on a system rely on ncurses provided by the system? > >=20 > > Check thread starting with following message. > >=20 > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-February/117710.= html >=20 > That's a start, but it gives an overly-broad approach, saying that > anything linked to the ncurses library has to be recompiled. >=20 > The ABI change is just to the (upper-level) curses interface. > Most of the programs you'll have in ports use the (lower-level) termcap > or terminfo interfaces. >=20 > For example gettext uses terminfo (not curses). >=20 > Curses applications use initscr or newterm (nm helps). > I have a script which uses nm to tell me which interface is used. >=20 > Actually, in my own ports, I don't see any which would be affected, > since all of the curses applications are the utilities for ncurses > (or for my testing of ncurses). >=20 > Here's an example of what it tells me > (n5=3D=3Dncurses5, tc=3Dtermcap, ti=3Dterminfo): >=20 > ti bison > n5*+ti captoinfo > n5*+ti captoinfo6 > n5*+ti clear > n5*+ti clear6 > n5+tc ded > n5+ti dialog4ports actually this one isn't one of mine (needs to be recompiled) But for the rest - recompiling would be a waste of time. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey https://invisible-island.net ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net --qwiiacggvlzqswl2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQTFIEjAwHSP7iJ9R6JwI1Pg9+SO2wUCXlRdtAAKCRBwI1Pg9+SO 22OaAKCA8JchaEl/kxMQjEpONXB/DR/BTACg2hWHtv/XjosJr6C/Lik3Iw855u8= =vN5T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qwiiacggvlzqswl2--