From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Sep 17  1: 1:27 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.de (mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3409A37B401
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 01:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fwd04.sul.t-online.de 
	by mailout01.sul.t-online.de with smtp 
	id 15itLG-0006ji-0B; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:01:22 +0200
Received: from peedub.muc.de (520017439985-0001@[217.2.57.239]) by fmrl04.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 15itL4-0whOHwC; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:01:10 +0200
Received: by peedub.muc.de (8.11.6/8.11.1) id f8H82Ho48696;
	Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:02:17 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from garyj)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org>
Reply-To: garyj@jennejohn.org
To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Subject: Re: importing xemacs-21.4
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:02:17 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <01091610471604.00491@peedub.muc.de> <20010916102442.C455@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010916102442.C455@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01091710021705.00491@peedub.muc.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Sender: 520017439985-0001@t-dialin.net
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Sunday 16 September 2001 19:24, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 10:47:16AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > What do people think about importing xemacs-21.4 as xemacs-devel ? This
> > would allow us to do a repository copy of the xemacs21 port, keep those
> > who want to be on the cutting-edge happy but still maintain a port for
> > those who prefer to use the release version of xemacs.
>
> If you're happy with the additional maintenance overhead, then I think
> this is a good idea.

Since I only got one replyh to my origianl mail I get the impression that 
noone really cares that much about which version of xemacs is in xemacs21.

Let me put the question in a different manner:

Does anyone care if I replace xemacs21.1.14 with xemacs21.4.4 in the xemacs21 
port ? Speak up now or forever hold your peace.

-- 
Gary Jennejohn garyj@jennejohn.org gj@freebsd.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message