Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:52:57 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@FreeBSD.org> To: David Sledge <dsledge@appriss.com> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) Message-ID: <273C02EB81D51F8607AEB1A4@rambutan.pingpong.net> In-Reply-To: <452286C2.3030902@appriss.com> References: <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF2054DE@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <54A56D47DC749F45C4291FD0@rambutan.pingpong.net> <452286C2.3030902@appriss.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On tisdag, oktober 03, 2006 11.50.26 -0400 David Sledge <dsledge@appriss.com> wrote: > > > Palle Girgensohn wrote: >> >> >> --On fredag, september 01, 2006 19.54.17 -0400 David Sledge >> <dsledge@appriss.com> wrote: >> >>> It looks like the safest thing to do is submit the port as >>> java/eclipse32 >>> and leave the existing java/eclipse port alone. As plugins get updated >>> for the new port of eclipse version 3.2 we will eventually be able to >>> remove the old port. I plan to submit the PR on Wednesday as I am >>> currently away from my FreeBSD computer :( . Thank you for all your >>> input, help and testing on this port. >> >> There is a patch release, 3.2.1. Will you consider adding those fixes, >> i.e. updating the port to 3.2.1, or is it too late for that? I guess >> we can always update the port later. >> >> I just stated, in another mail, that I'd rather see an update of the >> old port of eclipse, we really don't need two different ports for >> eclipse, but I guess just creating a new port is faster, and will fix >> existing plugin ports quicker. Oh well... >> >> /Palle >> > > Working on the build for 3.2.1 now. Hoping to have it done by the end of > the day. We talked about updating the the old port on this mailing list > and more people seemed to want it to be a separate port so we did not > break the dependencies. I am getting more and more emails now supporting > to update the existing eclipse port. I have no problem with that. I will > ask again how many people would prefer updating the original eclipse port > versus creating a new port? Please comment on this ASAP as I am working > on an update to eclipse 3.2.1. If you need help testing 3.2.1, feel free to ask! Bets Regards, Palle
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?273C02EB81D51F8607AEB1A4>