From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 03:38:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC9116A4CE for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:38:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (mta7.pltn13.pbi.net [64.164.98.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0588D43D2D for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:38:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (5c663b3a21a60012f4044c7fed90dae8@adsl-67-119-53-169.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.169])i1GBcfbF017547; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:38:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7246266D0E; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:38:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:38:40 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Paul A. Hoadley" Message-ID: <20040216113840.GA93732@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040216091316.98506.qmail@web9602.mail.yahoo.com> <20040216093332.GA85516@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040216102135.GC58487@grover.logicsquad.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040216102135.GC58487@grover.logicsquad.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spam removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:38:42 -0000 --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:51:35PM +1030, Paul A. Hoadley wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 01:33:32AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > I recommend bogofilter for per-user filtering. Spamassassin is also > > highly recommended for site use. >=20 > I'll second both. SpamAssassin worked well for me for several years, > but I recently changed from SA to bogofilter because SA just wasn't > keeping up with the latest craze of random word spams. Fortunately, I > had a 26,000-spam corpus with which to train bogofilter, so it's > already working quite well. It seems to be learning the random word > spams gradually. I had problems with those bayes-busters for a while until I adjusted my cutoff scores (according to the recommendation of bogotune)..it now catches all of those with 99% accuracy too. Kris --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAMKvAWry0BWjoQKURAmv4AKCGgTbQFZXz/7ornEdzP9uT5GVYLQCgv5W0 EFU/lpnZkoMzk08SgFVVmO4= =R+6J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--