From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 13 01:16:58 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8311106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:16:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com)
Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0018FC0C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (from bonomi@localhost)
	by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q8D1HGg1000114
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:17:16 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:17:16 -0500 (CDT)
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
Message-Id: <201209130117.q8D1HGg1000114@mail.r-bonomi.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20120912214704.GB19460@ethic.thought.org>
Subject: Re: cksum entire dir??
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:16:59 -0000


> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:47:04 -0700
> From: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>
> Subject: Re: cksum entire dir??
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:55:57AM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> >
[sneck]
> >
> > are you sure it's not 'md5sum' ? ... that seems to be on all my 
> > GNU/Linux machines.
> >
>
>  yup, you be right.  altho we have no md5 [[does FBSD?]], fedora does 
>  have md5sum.  makes me wonder why this flavor didnt do at least a 
>  symlink.   oh well.

to find out what you do have, try 'apropos'.
e.g.
   apropos checksum
   apropos md5
   apropos sha