From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct  1 12:04:21 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD81B1065690
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  1 Oct 2008 12:04:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8908FC15
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  1 Oct 2008 12:04:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32])
	by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1Kl0RI-0008Di-2y
	for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:04:20 +0300
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2
To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:04:20 +0300
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-ID: <E1Kl0RI-0008Di-2y@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
Cc: 
Subject: svn rev. number
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 12:04:21 -0000

Hi,
	Now that freebsd is under svn, I decided to try what I failed
with cvs, and actually using svn/svk/svnsync I have a mirror and a local branch
in sync!
Since the date reported by uname is not that relevant, is it possible to add
the svn-revision # ala build-...? This could make finding problems easier,
instead of kernel from 'date' one could say date/revision... just a thought.

danny