From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul  8 10:03:14 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E51106564A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  8 Jul 2010 10:03:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.84])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2BB8FC1E
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  8 Jul 2010 10:03:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32])
	by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1OWnwm-0005yp-Kq
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:03:12 +0300
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:03:12 +0300
From: Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-ID: <E1OWnwm-0005yp-Kq@kabab.cs.huji.ac.il>
Subject: problems with 8.1-PRERELEASE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:03:14 -0000

Hi,
I'm running a resent 8.1-Pre (Friday July 2nd), but I've seen this in previous
ones too, make buildworld -j will sometimes fail, or even panic.
when it failes it's usually some 'internal compiler error' or
panic: page fault. The failures I've seen on different hardware, all runing
amd64 version, so I doubt it's hardware. Another common point, the all are
multicores, both intel and amd.

Any one else seeing this?

	danny