From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 3 22: 4:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from gateway.posi.net (c1096725-a.smateo1.sfba.home.com [24.20.139.104]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4295237BA98 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:04:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kbyanc@posi.net) Received: from localhost (kbyanc@localhost) by gateway.posi.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA12224; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:05:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kbyanc@posi.net) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:05:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Kelly Yancey To: Ben Smithurst Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd human intervention question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Kelly Yancey wrote: > Hmm. Well, yes, -f will definately solve my problem. Thanks. But I still > think that -S shouldn't prompt you for a file to patch if it doesn't exist, > only to skip it. But that's a different matter now that I can finish the > port. :) > On closer inspection, -f still doesn't solve my problem. It'll skip the patch, but it still generates an error causing patch to return non-zero, thus halting the port build. :( Kelly -- Kelly Yancey - kbyanc@posi.net - Belmont, CA System Administrator, eGroups.com http://www.egroups.com/ Maintainer, BSD Driver Database http://www.posi.net/freebsd/drivers/ Coordinator, Team FreeBSD http://www.posi.net/freebsd/Team-FreeBSD/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message