From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 17:59:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BD0799 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:59:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AE68FC08 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from irix.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.39] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tiqaj-0007QG-UF; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:59:36 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tiqaj-0004Bd-OQ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:59:33 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBCHxXSd030786; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:59:33 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBCHxXZl030785; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:59:33 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:59:33 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201212121759.qBCHxXZl030785@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, swhetzel@gmail.com Subject: Re: r244114 ia64: make check-old-libs says /lib/libz.so.5 can be removed, but it is still needed by /usr/sbin/dtrace and /usr/sbin/lockstat In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -3.5 X-Spam-Level: --- Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:59:38 -0000 From swhetzel@gmail.com Wed Dec 12 17:55:00 2012 On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> I updated to r244114 on ia64 following the >> standard procedure. I then get: >> >> # make check-old-libs >>>>> Checking for old libraries >> /lib/libz.so.5 >> # >> >> while sysutils/libchk shows: >> >> Binaries that are linked with: /lib/libz.so.5 >> /usr/sbin/dtrace >> /usr/sbin/lockstat >> >> and indeed these two executables depend >> on this library: >> >> # ldd /usr/sbin/dtrace >> /usr/sbin/dtrace: >> libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000) >> libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000) >> libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000) >> libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000) >> libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000) >> libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2000000020246000) >> libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2000000020294000) >> # ldd /usr/sbin/lockstat >> /usr/sbin/lockstat: >> libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000) >> libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000) >> libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000) >> libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000) >> libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000) >> librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 (0x2000000020246000) >> libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x200000002025e000) >> libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20000000202ac000) >> # >> >> I see that these two executables are old: >> >> # ls -al /usr/sbin/dtrace /usr/sbin/lockstat >> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 58976 Jul 18 2010 /usr/sbin/dtrace >> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 72832 Jul 18 2010 /usr/sbin/lockstat >> # >> >> Does this mean that both dtrace and lockstat >> are obsolete and can be removed? >> > These 2 programs are part of the CDDL liscensed code. > > Do you have WITHOUT_CDDL defined in your src.conf or make.conf? If it > is defined, then you can remove them. Otherwise you'll need to > determine why they are not being built/installed. > I had another look at cddl/usr.sbin/Makefile, and it only builds lockstat and dtrace for i386, amd64, and powerpc. It doesn't build them for ia64. So it is safe to remove them. ok, this makes sense, thanks Anton