From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:29:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C289A16A40F for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0527743D5E for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:29:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8RMSRVS026720 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:28:27 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: 1159391956.5199.15.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:27:07 -0700 Message-Id: <1159396027.5199.18.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com Subject: Terrible hme throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:29:09 -0000 > well, like I said, for me 'scp file localhost:file0' is about 2.3x > faster on Solaris than FreeBSD. Sure, that's the first factor of two. There's one or two factors of two left to be found. Maybe it is the Sparc disadvantage for these sorts of calculations cited earlier. Must be heavy in integer math... Frank