From owner-cvs-all Sun Jun 3 9:56:54 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ruhr.de (in-ruhr4.ruhr.de [212.23.134.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA36B37B405 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 09:56:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ue@nathan.ruhr.de) Received: (qmail 25251 invoked by uid 10); 3 Jun 2001 16:56:44 -0000 Received: (from ue@localhost) by nathan.ruhr.de (8.11.3/8.11.2) id f53GqB492716; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:52:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ue) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:52:11 +0200 From: Udo Erdelhoff To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/send-pr send-pr.sh Message-ID: <20010603185211.B92007@nathan.ruhr.de> Mail-Followup-To: Mikhail Teterin , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200106030240.f532eb591298@freefall.freebsd.org> <200106031508.f53F8fP14293@aldan.algebra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200106031508.f53F8fP14293@aldan.algebra.com>; from mi@aldan.algebra.com on Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:08:40AM -0400 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:08:40AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On 2 Jun, Dima Dorfman wrote: [...] > > Put the originator's full name in the From and Reply-to fields, and > > stick their username (which sendmail will make into an e-mail address) > > inside '<>'. Sendmail will still DTRT with this, and it conveniently > > puts the submitter's name and e-mail address on one line, just like it > > should be after "Submitted by" in a commit message. >=20 > But will all mailwrap-able MTAs DTRT? They better DTRT or they don't belong on the Internet in the first place. If you read the various standard documents, starting with RFC 821/822, you will find that <> are defined as delimiters of a machine-parseable address and that the mailer is to use their content; ignoring all other parts of the line in question. IMHO, this change was long overdue. Check the history of PR docs/19604 for an example of the problems this change avoids. /s/Udo --=20 Kill them all. God will know his own. --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQCVAwUBOxprO0Poh1XnT6hxAQHLvwQAhSTDnR0QtDVxuVi5N6ooXR9p1F74VbkM fNiihI1wlQeKzpAmiAg6lTm1+Y0mhNEL/SOrLmtWIadt12SZKmJzQSZmoo3Lhttn 17s8RxuUvh9lMWrvxkvyLfcn3xDu2/3Ur81Bt/dy97TKNM0CoA2XDzmM8pdMeHC3 E/YYmSGOgEE= =WP4i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message