Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Feb 2020 23:44:47 +0300
From:      Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Intel NETMAP performance and packet type
Message-ID:  <20200203204447.GD8028@zxy.spb.ru>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I am try use Intel 82599ES in NETMAP mode for filtering traffic.

For SYN-flood case my application can recive (by poll(2)) about
12-13Mpps by 2 thread at X5675@3.07GHz (all other traffic don't
recived by kernel).

For ACK-flood case  my application can recive (by poll(2)) only about
5.8Mpss by 2 thread at same hardware. I am talk only about receive
packets, don't processing.

What is wrong?
How to packet payload influence to NETMAP performance?

ix0: flags=28943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,PPROMISC> metric 0 mtu 1500
        options=913838<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,NETMAP>
        ether 90:e2:ba:01:03:f6
        media: Ethernet autoselect (10Gbase-Twinax <full-duplex>)
        status: active
        nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
ix1: flags=28943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,PPROMISC> metric 0 mtu 1500
        options=913838<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,NETMAP>
        ether 90:e2:ba:01:03:f7
        media: Ethernet autoselect (10Gbase-Twinax <full-duplex>)
        status: active
        nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200203204447.GD8028>