Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:56:36 +0100 From: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com> To: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk> Cc: linimon@lonesome.com, adrian@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, nonesuch@longcount.org, brett@lariat.net Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <CAO%2BPfDdN8ooiokOG5=q7m3T3hwKRGdT_RXK3b6e8E%2B_Qp0LsTQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <E1Tij0J-000Po6-7j@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> References: <CAO%2BPfDdJJCyzJTr2R%2B0bOM-VQ1251FsMG5_W3_58rL4KYwYdng@mail.gmail.com> <E1Tij0J-000Po6-7j@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You're right, but one who install a 9.1-RELEASE from iso will obviously still have the same SVN revision, of course it is still great when following -STABLE. 2012/12/12 Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk> > > Is the SVN revision gonna disappear from the uname -a output ? I hope. > > This comment surprises me - having the svn revision there is one of the > best thigns about moving to svn from csup for me. I can look at a running > machine, and know how to chekcout precisely the code is was built from. > Very > useful. > > -pete. > -- Demelier David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAO%2BPfDdN8ooiokOG5=q7m3T3hwKRGdT_RXK3b6e8E%2B_Qp0LsTQ>