From owner-freebsd-small Tue Dec 19 10:57: 3 2000 From owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 19 10:56:59 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from peorth.iteration.net (peorth.iteration.net [208.190.180.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E4937B400; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:56:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by peorth.iteration.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1820357308; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:56:58 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:56:58 -0600 From: "Michael C . Wu" To: Devin Butterfield Cc: freebsd-small@freebsd.org, Jordan Hubbard , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: StrongARM support? Message-ID: <20001219125657.A94588@peorth.iteration.net> Reply-To: "Michael C . Wu" Mail-Followup-To: "Michael C . Wu" , Devin Butterfield , freebsd-small@freebsd.org, Jordan Hubbard , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <78656.976769151@winston.osd.bsdi.com> <3A3862E4.5A46E14C@wireless.net> <20001218151235.D69041@peorth.iteration.net> <3A3EA852.A668B554@wireless.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A3EA852.A668B554@wireless.net>; from dbutter@wireless.net on Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:14:10PM -0800 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5025 F691 F943 8128 48A8 5025 77CE 29C5 8FA1 2E20 X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x8FA12E20 Sender: keichii@peorth.iteration.net Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:14:10PM -0800, Devin Butterfield scribbled: | "Michael C . Wu" wrote: | > The most important decision now would be: | > Should we concentrate on the PPC port first? Or should we go at each | > port simultaneously? | | Well, if there are enough people with PCC's that are interested in | helping with the effort then perhaps pursuing the PPC port first would | make more sense. I don't have a PPC so I couldn't help out there... | | If the decision is to pursue a StrongARM port then you can count me in. I'm definitely interested in both StrongARM and PPC. (and so are very many people) My understanding is that FreeBSD *wants* a FreeBSD/ARM, but lack the resources/man-power to do so. I'd prefer to see an official decision on the above by someone (hint hint -core :)) though. -- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | keichii@peorth.iteration.net | keichii@bsdconspiracy.net | | http://peorth.iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. | +------------------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message