From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 12:42:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D464D4D6 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frv198.fwdcdn.com (frv198.fwdcdn.com [212.42.77.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA8F1D82 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:42:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=ffe; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Cc:To:Subject:From:Date; bh=MgtXFb7I6q1mbw2jOo94Diaf3Debe5Aa8QkbofjH1sU=; b=U6lMUU3fiV+Dy9RB88UviRw3wnEYWFfZYBSC+Di8DDHkstAYdG9jEZPwsHqqQNZw32mrAg5WAFVbadCZuDbnE8IT3TmmL67VeGrRazei8NVXRAOmBNtEPGWIX7ukJZZGj2EdaZOtx1S/qgEnACfy7Qa97KA0W7W+wKlkf4VCx+0=; Received: from [10.10.10.35] (helo=frv35.fwdcdn.com) by frv198.fwdcdn.com with smtp ID 1WYEIw-000Hx0-BB for net@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:42:06 +0300 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:42:05 +0300 From: Vladislav Prodan Subject: Re[2]: Re[2]: Some gruesome moments with performance of FreeBSD at over 20K interfaces To: Ermal =?iso-8859-1?b?THXnaQ==?= X-Mailer: mail.ukr.net 5.0 Message-Id: <1397133674.156493243.42smhi32@frv35.fwdcdn.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1397077963.756961709.gspkmzvd@frv35.fwdcdn.com> <1397127901.499782177.24smhe7a@frv35.fwdcdn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from universite@ukr.net by frv35.fwdcdn.com; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:42:05 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Content-Disposition: inline Cc: stable@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, "net@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:42:13 -0000 > > Another note related to Q-in-Q. > > > You would probably be better of creating standard vlans for the first vlan layer and use ng_vlan for the second++ part of the Q-in-Q on top of the first ones. > This also give better usability and will speedup a bit your times. > > > So I implemented the q-in-q. -- Vladislav V. Prodan System & Network Administrator http://support.od.ua +380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508 VVP88-RIPE