From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  5 11:27:49 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E811065676;
	Sat,  5 Mar 2011 11:27:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.212.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58408FC20;
	Sat,  5 Mar 2011 11:27:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so3131530vws.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:27:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=yLxFyOUbfjP7mHwCG8EweVs68wmLNSrDj+fz7/vA+Aw=;
	b=AwK5VioqfRnMu4gLlYYpP26HR2Y1bKEnfxeITVN918Jk3CkTM5osGp6ctwrYtUgVyg
	tk9eh/5lpdoAyh1ixPAtnX8VjrZvVxRYzQwZSSekjOd+4XpXPF+x25CQp52rOKfDOrDo
	9uiak1LkmhsQyWbnVpfqe/Ap5oM6fk0sa5L+g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=kusyuVdpFzsvEs7Lq9PWWcX2Yukr3s7gScWKTZFbodTx4zv7WMOOzcN2KgumllPH++
	fhxRzZkpnNKdcLs/3l/pvoLSkC3PfZIn70VQl5w2Nl4JReedrgQ7wIHDAZd/YWSJcXXq
	7e2VcRFHnJNja7w5/GWnBmJmgLLHK7NB6deys=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.0.9 with SMTP id 9mr2484715vda.147.1299324468085; Sat, 05
	Mar 2011 03:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.167.3 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 03:27:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20110305084520.GB2833@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr>
References: <AANLkTim_mTTLPA6KbT2b7pxm1ZmrS7cq5ew99P3zAFZa@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110305084520.GB2833@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 03:27:48 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTik6fhKqRgP=kfyCxkZkG2ZD92BJYEobuvwvzvk+@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
To: Urankar Mikael <mikael.urankar@ujf-grenoble.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
	freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 11:27:49 -0000

Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything!



Adrian

On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael <mikael.urankar@ujf-grenoble.fr>wrote:

> On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
> > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
> >
> > I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few
> bugs
> > in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced regressions.
> I'd
> > like to make sure that I haven't broken legacy (11abg) support in
> > weird/wonderful ways. I'd also like to make sure that I haven't
> > broken/changed the behaviour or performance of the NICs in any way.
> >
> > Please give things a good thrashing and let me know the results.
> >
> > I'm still working towards debugging and enabling basic 11n support, but I
> > need to first make sure that I haven't broken legacy operation in any
> way.
> >
>
> Are you interested by tests on an old atheros card (Atheros 5212, AR2413
> mac 7.9 RF2413 phy 4.5) ?
>