From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 22 11:48:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA27171 for current-outgoing; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 11:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from isbalham.ist.co.uk (isbalham.ist.co.uk [192.31.26.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA27166 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 11:48:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from gid.co.uk (uucp@localhost) by isbalham.ist.co.uk (8.8.4/8.8.4) with UUCP id TAA00411; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 19:46:28 GMT Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 19:41:01 GMT Received: from [194.32.164.2] by seagoon.gid.co.uk; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 19:41:01 GMT X-Sender: rb@194.32.164.1 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <19970322184530.BI55538@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: ; from Kenneth R. Westerback on Mar 20, 1997 20:59:52 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: 2.2R (src 2.2 211): == dialing Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 5:45 pm -0000 22/3/97, J Wunsch wrote: >For some strange reason, the `shutdown_nice()' in the kernel sends a >SIGHUP to all processes first. I've also noticed messages like >``Reloading nameserver'' or such. The SIGHUP was historically intended to 'hang up' sessions on serial ports. Processes not attached to a terminal shouldn't be sent the signal. -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK