From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jun 12 1:12:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4972137B403 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 01:12:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kaltorak@quake.com.au) Received: from [203.164.12.28] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB6169.63.5724aadf) with ESMTP id xfnbaaaa for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:11:30 +1000 Message-ID: <3B25CF6A.F871E2EE@quake.com.au> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:14:34 +1000 From: Kal Torak X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: W Gerald Hicks Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? References: <3B25CAEC.27AF9D30@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG W Gerald Hicks wrote: > > > No. Threads like this are completely wasting the time of people who use > it for its chartered purposes. The feedback process is centered on the > proper use of send-pr. > > Truth is, this thread is a pulverised mass of dead horse flesh that has > been beat for years by people expecting a free operating system to > conform to some mental model they have formed in absence of what has > actually been communicated by the project. > > Cripes people, the CVS repository is available for people to be able to > slide back and forth in time as necessary. It only requires a tiny bit > of competence. For fair effort on your part you also gain a fair amount > of liberty along with a system that has literally made computing history > in terms of stability. On top of that, it's free. > > > Can this stupid thread please die now? Threads like this come up every few months, I just try to ignore them and hope they go away :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message