From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 19 15:46:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA20325 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 15:46:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.camalott.com ([208.203.140.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA20314 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 15:46:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joelh@gnu.org) Received: from detlev.UUCP (tex-120.camalott.com [208.229.74.120]) by mail.camalott.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA08038; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:47:03 -0500 Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA14775; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:45:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from joelh) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:45:23 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199808192245.RAA14775@detlev.UUCP> To: nate@mt.sri.com CC: tlambert@primenet.com, jbryant@unix.tfs.net, peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199808191523.JAA20095@mt.sri.com> (message from Nate Williams on Wed, 19 Aug 1998 09:23:26 -0600) Subject: Re: proposal to not change time_t From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.org References: <199808190235.VAA12287@unix.tfs.net> <199808190503.WAA01910@usr06.primenet.com> <199808191523.JAA20095@mt.sri.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > ps. The reason NetBSD doesn't have this is the same reason their CVS > tree is not public. The code in their CVS tree is *still* pre-Lite > bits, let alone Lite/Lite2. (Though I suspect they've imported some > of the bits from both, though obviously not all of them.....) Which reminds me... What OS's out there *are* Lite2-based? Just us and BSD/I? -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message