From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 14 18:04:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CD3106567F for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@lissyara.su) Received: from hosting.lissyara.su (hosting.lissyara.su [77.221.149.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840B48FC13 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.41.96.17] (port=11995 helo=dc7700p.lissyara.su) by hosting.lissyara.su with esmtpa (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1O26c0-00015j-Bc for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:42:52 +0400 Message-ID: <4BC5FE94.3000205@lissyara.su> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:42:44 +0400 From: Alex Keda User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; ru-RU; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100403 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20100414100902.GB80702@megatron.madpilot.net> <1271241794.28425.58703.camel@vcampaign> <20100414121533.GC80702@megatron.madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <20100414121533.GC80702@megatron.madpilot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Description: if spam count > 60 - this is spam X-Spam-Count: 0 X-Spam-Description: if spam count > 60 - this is spam X-Spam-Count: 0 X-Descriptions: powered by www.lissyara.su X-Bounce-ID: hosting.lissyara.su Subject: Re: PHP 5.2 (lang/php52) port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:04:31 -0000 14.04.2010 16:15, Guido Falsi пишет: > The maintainer of the php ports has already stated that maintaining the > php port framework is a considerable burdern. > > I'm not him. I'm quite happy with the presenty situation since I > run very few php webapps written by others(and various smallish > ones written by myself). I can't really comment on his decisions. > FreeBSD being a voluntary work effort he has the right to do whatever > he likes. > > If you really need this you could try creating the needed ports. Basing > your effort on the old verion of the existing ones should give you a > good headstart. > > I really don't see any option from you. Anything that is in FreeBSD is > there because some interested party made it happen. > > This is true for BASD since it's original conception at the Berkeley > University in 1977(from the history I've studied at last). so many people want php5.2 in ports. I am ready to support this set of ports. but ale@ does not respond to my letters =) ========= I do not really important - it will take to the ports tree or not, I will in any case, I will support this patchset, but if it does not take it, I modify it to what is needed specifically for me, but not all (adding to it png1.2, Zend3.3.9 ....)