Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 22:51:20 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: James FitzGibbon <james@targetnet.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: T/TCP friendly inetd change? Message-ID: <200003172251.aa89166@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Mar 2000 09:46:35 EST." <20000317094635.B41950@targetnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I like T/TCP (I use it on some of my networked apps for the same reasons you > describe), but I don't think that it should be added to a program like inetd > which has two default settings that would need to be changed before the > T/TCP extensions would ever provide any benefit. The changes I've suggested don't actually require T/TCP to be useful, they just make inetd friendlier to T/TCP connections if they come in. When T/TCP isn't used they just put the FIN for the TCP connection on the last data packet, instead of on a seperate packet, so saving one packet. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi? <200003172251.aa89166>