From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 08:01:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836BE37B405 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:01:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EDD43F75 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:01:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rehsack@liwing.de) Received: (qmail 72602 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2003 16:01:01 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Apr 2003 16:01:01 -0000 Message-ID: <3E8B093D.4010500@liwing.de> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 18:01:01 +0200 From: Jens Rehsack Organization: LiWing IT-Services User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 16:01:12 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > On 02-Apr-2003 Peter Schultz wrote: > >>I'm sorry for beating a dead horse. A guy and I from tcbug were just >>trying to fix his postfix installation, he does not know what happened, >>it just stopped working. There would not have been a problem if >>sendmail wasn't tied into the system so closely. I'm just hoping core >>will say, "submit a working solution and it will be done," so that >>there's a little inspiration here. >> >>Pete... > > > First, core@ is not the appropriate body for that type of request. > Both current@ and arch@ are much better targets. Second, is > NO_SENDMAIL + the postfix port inadequate? > The problem I see with that is, that even a minimalistic base install installs things like sendmail, ppp, atm-stuff, g77 and so on. I really think splitting the base in some sub-parts would it make much easier to do NO_SENDMAIL on my own. So I had to remove each not required file separately. That's no good solution. Regards, Jens