From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 22 16:02:04 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BFA1065679;
	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru)
Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B9A8FC25;
	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:02:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [85.173.17.244] (helo=izar)
	by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD))
	id 1NN7BS-000NHp-Se; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:02:03 +0300
From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:02:02 +0300
Message-ID: <34237237@ipt.ru>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: ume@FreeBSD.org
Subject: mail/x-face-e21 depends upon gtk12 and gtk20
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:02:04 -0000

Hi,

I've just discovered that the port mail/x-face-e21 depends upon
both gtk12 and gtk20:
-----
% make -C /usr/ports/mail/x-face-e21 all-depends-list | grep 'gtk[12]'
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk12
-----

Gtk12 is an inherited dependency of mail/faces.

Is this OK? Or should such cases be avoided?

Thanks!

-- 
WBR, bsam