From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 11 20:31:48 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1379E9DB73 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 20:31:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [209.237.23.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F1077B88 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 20:31:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from roble.com (roble.com [209.237.23.50]) by mx5.roble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9F43D947 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:31:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:31:47 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 20:31:48 -0000 Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Personally I think if you remove Sendmail you should not replace it with > something else... but then FreeBSD is not about what I want or what the > users want anymore. I thought there already was a viable replacement in OpenSMTPD? The fact that OpenBSD migrated 3 years ago makes this a no-brainer, or does anyone think accepting mail from remote hosts needs to be part of base? Considering just about every other open source OS distribution now uses Postfix the potential for its license to be updated (from IPL to EPL2.0) may be timely... Roger