From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  9 07:44:56 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7DA6137B401; Wed,  9 Jul 2003 07:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msr89.hinet.net (msr89.hinet.net [168.95.4.189])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4281943F85; Wed,  9 Jul 2003 07:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mtlin1@ms36.hinet.net)
Received: from morton (paradise.mtlin.org [202.39.10.196])
	by msr89.hinet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA04014;
	Wed, 9 Jul 2003 22:44:54 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <002d01c3462a$a3a81be0$c40a27ca@morton>
From: "Morton Lin" <mtlin1@ms36.hinet.net>
To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 22:59:02 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="big5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
cc: ponomarew@oberon.net
cc: DougB@freebsd.org
Subject: ports/foo/nut conflict ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Morton Lin <mtlin1@ms36.hinet.net>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 14:44:56 -0000

Hi, Sir :

There were two named "nut" ports in the ports tree.

1) ports/misc/nut/ 
    (from http://www.freebsd.org/ports/misc.html I saw 
     its name should be "health-nut-8.8" or something 
     like that ? )
2) ports/sysutils/nut/

Should we make some differences between them ?

BTW, ports gd2 was already upgraded by maintainer.
Is there any plan to upgrade ports/sysutils/nut to fix
the "make cgi" broken problem?

Thank you very much !


Best Regards,
Morton Lin.