From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Dec 9 10: 1: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tank.skynet.be (tank.skynet.be [195.238.2.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E04414A03 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 10:01:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by tank.skynet.be (8.9.3/odie-relay-v1.0) with ESMTP id TAA15926; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 19:00:53 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@foxbert.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 19:00:11 +0100 To: John Polstra From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Route table leaks Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 9:36 AM -0800 1999/12/9, John Polstra wrote: > That's right. You don't even need to do a make world. Just apply the > patch, build and install a new kernel, and reboot. Kernel is rebuilt and the machine has come back up. I've got a script running to monitor the leakage. However, I obviously haven't been running very long, and there's been no chance to see the leak. Do you have any suggestion on how I can try to force some leakage? Thanks! -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ____________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, News & FTP Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message