Date: 25 Apr 2000 02:30:32 -0700 From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: syslog-ng's category (see PR 18187) Message-ID: <vqcog6ymssn.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:32:43 -0400" References: <20000425001747.B445@argon.blackdawn.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004250022310.331-100000@picnic.mat.net> <20000425003243.C445@argon.blackdawn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> * On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 12:26:54AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: * > Noting that both are reasonable answers, I would say that since it's only * > a user of security, and doesn't either provide security to other services * > or audits (only use security in providing it's own service) I would stick * > it into sysutils. * * I would, too. But I'm going to gather opinions before I make a decision. So * far the favor seems to be sysutils. I agree with Chuck, for whatever it's worth. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcog6ymssn.fsf>