From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jul 9 8:49:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CBF37B7DF for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 08:49:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA28556; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 08:49:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id IAA48509; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200007091549.IAA48509@vashon.polstra.com> To: trevor@jpj.net Subject: Re: cvs-crypto unknown In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article , Trevor Johnson wrote: > Personally, I use the separate collections because cvsup times out > otherwise (I guess my connection is too slow). A slow network won't cause this. There must be some other problem. The cvsupd server times out a connection only if it has had no network traffic for 15 minutes. Even 1 byte every 15 minutes will keep it from timing out. Also, assuming you're grabbing the whole src tree, using separate collections instead of src-all doesn't decrease the network traffic. In fact, it increases the traffic slightly. I should also mention that using separate collections loads the servers more than using src-all. Really if you want to sync with the whole src tree, using src-all is the best in every way. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message