From owner-freebsd-multimedia Mon Aug 11 02:14:23 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA23335 for multimedia-outgoing; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 02:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from labs.usn.blaze.net.au (mail@labs.usn.blaze.net.au [203.17.53.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA23293 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 02:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from labs.usn.blaze.net.au [127.0.0.1] (davidn) by labs.usn.blaze.net.au with esmtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0wxqXO-00005w-00 (Debian); Mon, 11 Aug 1997 19:13:18 +1000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Amancio Hasty cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xquake + sound?? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 10 Aug 1997 21:39:29 MST." <199708110439.VAA11391@rah.star-gate.com> X-Face: (W@z~5kg?"+5?!2kHP)+l369.~a@oTl^8l87|/s8"EH?Uk~P#N+Ec~Z&@;'LL!;3?y Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 19:13:17 +1000 From: David Nugent Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > S3 Trio64V+ (for quake, configured with a 300x200 modeline) > > Not sure why xquake + sound works for you and will try to investigate > of why it does work for me with the define "BROKENSB". Yeah, I thought it a bit strange too, given the earlier comments I read. > Just noticed that you are running at 300x200 and if your cpu > can take it you can run at 640x480 . Sure. Runs ok in all modes up to 1024x768 too. But when you're running fairly intensive apps with quake deathmatch and ctf bots in it, some considerable cpu is used, and 320x200 is definitely better performance wise. > Thats joystick support for doom or xquake 8) Ah, no, I'm *definitely* a mouse person. :-) Regards, David